Tuesday 24 November 2015

ROOSEVELT SINGLE STICK

“He seemingly takes as much joy in receiving blows as in giving them. When he used to play at single-sticks with General Wood, the latter, remembering that his opponent was President, refrained from hitting him at first, but at last, warming up to the work, would crack him without mercy, for Wood is the President’s superior in this exercise. As soon as the blows began to rain upon his body, Mr. Roosevelt would leap about, I am credibly informed, “fairly shrieking with delight…A good crack with a single-stick hurts, but it is probable that the President gets so much sheer physical joy out of a contest of this kind that he is unconscious of the pain” – Roosevelt’s French fencing instructor on Teddy Roosevelt
It was Major General Leonard Wood that frequently went to blows with Roosevelt. Wood and Roosevelt had a long-standing friendship. Wood was acting Colonel of the Rough Riders and subsequently the Military-Governor of Cuba. Once Cuban occupation was over, Wood returned to the States and under the command of his friend and Commander-in-Chief.
The papers frequently wrote of bruises on Teddy’s hands and head:

 Article on Roosevelt and Woods 


It comes as no surprise that TR rarely obeyed the rules of single-stick. When Wood got in a good lick, Roosevelt would go all-in, jumping on furniture, pounding away with his stick like a club, and enjoying the exercise immensely.

Thursday 8 October 2015

Faith in the Poison

'Nous avons foi au poison. Nous savons donner notre vie tout entière tous les jours.'


Arthur Rimbaud




------




Pascal was unique; just like everyone else.

He had his own stories, and his own dreams- though he'd never admit to his fears.





He had been many things in life, and saw the possibility of being yet many more.






For now, he was an agent of the law.

Not- as some believed or clung to- a Law with a capital 'L', that came from some divine or even scientific sanction; but the bastard mix of rules and consensus taboos that had been formed to both help and hinder the common man.


None of this particularly bothered, or warmed, Pascal.

He was out for himself, as he believed was everyone else, and though he wore the external costume of a faithful Catholic and liberal, 'Ni Dieu ni maître' pretty much summed up his position.



We've  mentioned already the existence of stories and dreams (and denied our fears!),

and I suppose it might be wise to present an element of all three here....





......




When he escaped the Army; fled, Pascal assumed he would always be a man on the run.

Indeed, it was a number of years before he learned the sorry fate of his regiment, and was able to step out from the shadows of his fugitive lifestyle.



Not for the first time, a gut feeling or inner command had caused him to act in just the right way, at just the right time.


Some would call that a blessing, others luck- Pascal himself preferred to attribute everything good to himself, and everything bad to others- so he would settle for suspecting some kind of 'auto-providence' was involved.



He married the girl that was to bear him two blind sons out of a mix of lust and boredom, which many would call 'love'.

By this time, he was engaged in the respectable profession of  an inn-keeper; which following his custom or inclination, he managed to do in an anything but respectable fashion.


Whilst his family would say that he'd been 'born bad', he just assumed that they had been 'born stupid', and unable to see the possibilities and the fun that could be had from going one's own way and playing one's own game.


Eventually, having amassed quite a large amount of money- and a larger amount still of enemies and police interest- he once again fled..............er, moved on in search of adventure.



The next, brief anecdote we will leave in the sensitive hands of one of his blind- and unnamed for the purposes of our narrative- sons...



......



My father was by turns an amusing and cruel man; sometimes both at the same time.


He is still infamous in the region, even all these years later.

He was a marvellous wit and raconteur, and one never knew to what degree his fabulous stories were true or mere inventions.


He actually didn't treat us badly; he kept us well-fed and comfortable, and even occasionally showed some interest in us as human beings, but generally he was cold and distant, and either holding something back or leaving people with the impression that that was the case.



A number of murders in the area have since been attributed to him, and it's certainly possible given his quick temper, love of action and definite sadistic streak.


Many a time did he punch or kick an unruly or rude patron into submission or unconsciousness.


He had studied the use of hands, feet, sticks, knives, swords and rifles in combat- and had at one time or other employed all of these on his fellow man.



His quick wits and tongue have passed on to serve myself well.

Apparently, I am also the spitting image of him- although clearly this I can never confirm...



The mental image I have of him may be something like the one that you, the reader, are forming in your head-

yet the image my father had of himself, only he will ever know.



...




'You are the finest police officer this station has ever known!', gushed the superintendant, still amazed that the gang had been brought down.

'How did you do it?', he continued, and then sensing a weighted silence, '.....no, of course! A great detective must have his secrets! ha ha  Only natural.   Please, take a......drink', he trailed off, seeing that Pascal was already pouring himself- but not the superintendant- a very large brandy.



...



I see the sentry posted out front, and equally note his boredom and fatigue.

He doesn't notice me.

I move to the dark corner just behind him, and watch and wait.

Soon, they arrive and enter with little fuss.

With the sentry's back turned to the street, I seize my moment.

My lead-filled truncheon needed to 'touch' the oaf's great head only twice- once where the spine meets the skull, and once just behind the ear- to put him beyond any immediate action.

When he awoke- if he awoke- he would have found the building in flames, and locked from the outside with his very own keys.



...



The newspapers tell of great things happening, of vast changes on the world stage.


I am an actor, who plays many parts- and my audience adores me; as well they should!



Before I take my bow, and before the final curtain of death descends,

does my dear reader have any requests?



...




'Plonger au fond du gouffre, Enfer ou Ciel, qu'importe ? Au fond de l'Inconnu pour trouver du nouveau !'

Charles Baudelaire


Pascal, many have said, was an artist.
Like a musician or a poet, he shaped and crafted situations and people, and left something more compelling and indeed more beautiful in his wake.
Heroes and villains are things for bad children's stories, I think- hence my living the way I do, and why my way/s of seeing the world have brought this 'Pascal' into imaginary existence.

Why must so many be happy to read or watch adventure and action tales, without ever seeking such experiences in their own lives?

Is it that they wish to live their lives 'by proxy'?

Will they remain in captivity, while imagining some kind of vicarious freedom?

That is Pascal talking; as I myself, the writer of this piece, am certainly no Anarchist!

...

The final act (of God, perhaps?).

An old man waits in his chair at home, knowing that his fate is coming.
In his hand- which is hidden behind his leg- a knife that has been sharpened and sharpened, ready for this very day.

Pascal's intuition is as sharp and accurate as ever, and when the door is thumped loudly, our protaganist rises from the chair, and takes an angle to the door, only seconds before it is kicked in.

The first man through is stabbed straight in the neck by Pascal, and the brute falls to his knees, trying hopelessly to stem the flow of life with his fingers.
The second assassin, hesitating for a split second, raises a metal bar far too obviously, and far too slowly.
Pascal circles off to the right to move with the blow, reducing its force like a boxer might.

He raises his left arm, wrapped in a thick coat, and barely feels any pain as the implement lands.
The enemy feels little pain either, as Pascal wraps the arm with the bar under his armpit, and repeatedly plunges the thirsty knife into the ribs and chest of his 'dance partner'.

The wretch clings desperately to Pascal, who releases the hold with a committed, sickening headbutt into his adversary's nose.


Pascal scans quickly, but sees no others.
He steps into the hallway, where one, simple discharge from a half-seen revolver ends his colourful life/story (aren't these the same thing?!) with little fanfare or mourning....



 'Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations ; Judas par exemple avait des amis irréprochables.'

Paul Verlaine




Sunday 13 September 2015

'CLEAN' KNIFE DUELLING vs KNIFE ASSAULTS AND FIGHTS




SO MUCH OF KNIFE-BASED MARTIAL ARTS IS FOUNDED ON A DUELLING/SPARRING MENTALITY, WHICH HAS EXISTED HISTORICALLY (AND STILL DOES IN SOME PLACES), YET REALLY DOESN'T FIT THE GENERAL MODEL OF KNIFE USE (EITHER CRIMINAL OR FOR EMERGENCY SELF DEFENCE) IN A MODERN EUROPEAN (OR OTHER) CITY.

KNIVES CAN BE WIELDED EITHER TO DETER AN ATTACKER (IF YOU'RE A 'GOOD GUY'), OR TO THREATEN AND COERCE (IF YOU'RE THE 'BAD GUY' IN THAT SCENE);
BUT OTHER THAN THAT, THEY ARE VERY LETHAL BUT LIMITED TOOLS.

I HAVE PERSONALLY KNOWN TWO PEOPLE WHO DIED OF STAB WOUNDS (AND HAVE KNOWN OTHERS WHO HAVE SURVIVED, AND EVEN SEEN ONE STABBING UP VERY CLOSE), AND IN BOTH FATALITIES, IT WAS A SINGLE STAB WOUND THAT DID IT.

IN BOTH CASES, TOO, THE VICTIM REMOVED THEMSELVES TO ANOTHER PLACE, WHERE THEY THEN DIED.

THE POINT IS, THAT EVEN A FATAL STAB WOUND CANNOT BE RELIED ON TO 'STOP' AN ATTACKER, IN THE WAY THAT HEAVY IMPACT TO THE HEAD MIGHT.


SO, THIS TELLS US THAT

1) IF WE NEED TO USE A KNIFE TO SAVE OUR LIVES, WE MUST ACCEPT THAT THE OTHER PERSON VERY POSSIBLY WILL DIE, BUT THAT THIS MAY NOT STOP THE IMMEDIATE ASSAULT.

2) IF SOMEONE STABS US, WE MAY OR MAY NOT DIE, BUT IT IS UNLIKELY TO INSTANTLY INCAPACITATE US.



ANYONE WHO HAD REFLECTED ON THE REALITY OF SUCH DESPERATE AND HORRIFIC SITUATIONS WOULD HAVE PROBABLY WORKED ALL THIS OUT, ALREADY.






AS WITH ALL COMBAT, ANYONE WHO EVEN VAGUELY KNOWS WHAT THEY'RE DOING WILL LOOK TO MAKE THE EVENT 'ASSYMETRICAL'; WITH SURPRISE, DECEPTION, PRE-EMPTION AND SUPERIOR FORCE (SIZE, NUMBERS, A WEAPON, ETC.).


A KNIFE ATTACK IS NOT DIFFERENT.
WHICHEVER 'SIDE' OF THE ASSYMETRIC EQUATION WE'RE ON, IF THERE IS NO AVOIDANCE OR ESCAPE, WE MUST LOOK TO 'WEIGH THE SCALES' IN OUR FAVOUR, WHATEVER WAY IS POSSIBLE.


I WON'T DETAIL WAYS OF DOING THIS, AS CREATIVITY, QUICK THINKING AND 'TACTICAL INTELLIGENCE' ARE THINGS THAT YOU (THE READER) MUST DEVELOP- AS WE ALL MUST- TO INCREASE OUR LONG-TERM SURVIVAL..... ;)




-------------



ENOUGH SELF DEFENCE ADVICE (FOR NOW, ANYWAY! LOL), AND NOW JUST ON WITH SOME HISTORICAL IMAGES WHICH DETAIL THE LESS...........'ROMANTIC', SHALL WE SAY................LESS 'GLAMOROUS' SIDE OF L'ARME BLANCHE.



 


CAN'T CLEARLY SEE WHAT'S GOING ON?
IT'S NOT UNCOMMON THAT PEOPLE IN A FIGHT DON'T EVEN SEE THE KNIFE, OR KNOW THEY'VE BEEN STABBED TILL AFTERWARDS....


 










 





 


 


 


 



 


 


 


 


 




GOOD LUCK! :)
SHIELDS, 'BLINDERS' AND PROJECTILE WEAPON USE;
HISTORICAL METHODS STILL RELEVANT TODAY.





 THIS CLASSIC METHOD ABOVE I TRAIN, USING THE SMALL RUCKSACK AND UMBRELLA I OFTEN CARRY ON MY DAILY TRAVELS.
I HAVE PRESSURE TESTED THIS NUMEROUS TIMES, USING A PERSON ARMED WITH A RUBBER BAT AND WEARING A FENCING MASK, WHO TRIES AS HARD AS THEY CAN TO BLUDGEON OR THRUST AT ME, WHILE I THRUST INTO OR AT THEIR FACE AGGRESSIVELY, USING EVASIVE FOOTWORK AND ENVIRONMENTAL OBSTACLES TO EFFECT MY ESCAPE.

THE MAIN THING TO GUARD AGAINST IS THE OPPONENT GRABBING YOUR UMBRELLA/STICK, OR CLOSING YOU DOWN.



-----------------

 






 AS WELL AS USING AN OBJECT AS A SHIELD, IT CAN BE USED TO COVER THE OPPONENT'S LINE OF SIGHT (I CALL THIS A 'BLINDER')- EVEN FOR A SPLIT SECOND- CREATING AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ESCAPE OR ATTACK.



-------------------







FROM HERE, I WOULD KICK HIM IN THE NUTS AND/OR RUN (OR IN EXTREME CASES, LOOK TO FINISH HIM WITH SOME KIND OF TOOL).




-----------------



ANYTHING THAT FUNCTIONS AS A SHIELD AND IS AVAILABLE COULD POTENTIALLY SAVE YOUR LIFE.






 


CHAIRS ARE OFTEN EASY TO ACCESS, AND VERY VIABLE OBJECTS FOR SELF DEFENCE.



MODERN SAVATE PRACTITIONERS PRACTICING CHAIR USE.


THE CHAIR CAN BE USED DEFENSIVELY AND OFFENSIVELY, AS A SHIELD, 'BLINDER' (TO COVER VISION), IMPACT OR PROJECTILE WEAPON.

THE DANGER IS THAT SOMEONE GRABS THE CHAIR, AND YOU ARE STUCK IN SOME
BIZARRE AND DESPERATE WRESTLING FIGHT (!).
KICKS CAN BE THROWN BELOW THE CHAIR (CHASSE BAS TO KNEE/SHIN AND COUP DE PIED POINTE TO NUTS), AND/OR THE CHAIR CAN BE DITCHED AS YOU ESCAPE.


A MAJOR CONCERN OF PROJECTILE WEAPONS IS THAT THEY CAN GET THROWN BACK AT YOU.
THIS OFTEN HAPPENS IN FIGHTS BETWEEN LARGE GROUPS; WITH MISSILES FLYING BACK AND FORTH.


I ONCE HAD QUITE A WILD FIGHT WITH A GUY IN A TENT IN A TOWN ON THE EDGE OF THE SAHARA (AS YOU DO! LOL), WHICH AT ONE POINT HAD ME THROWING A METAL BOX INTO HIS FACE.
IT STUNNED HIM, BUT HE PROMPTLY THREW IT BACK.
LUCKILY, I DUCKED!


------------


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPEc1kP3Nwo

CHAIR (AND LATER BROOM) + GUTS AND AGGRESSION  vs COWARDLY KNIFE WIELDING CRIMINALS (CHECK OUT THE TROUSERS FALLING DOWN! LOL)



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IV79_HWMz8

SOME ALUMINIUM CHAIRS AND POWER SWINGING, AND NOW THIS MCDONALDS BELONGS TO US!



 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaospANfdxY

IT'S FAIR TO SAY THAT'S A LEGITIMATE BRAWL



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzmRtBGPqQw

THESE CRIMINALS GET BEATEN WITH JUST ABOUT EVERY PIECE OF FURNITURE IN CHINA!



 -----------------------------



http://cdn.coresites.factorymedia.com/mpora_new/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/how-to-use-your-bike-as-a-weapon-3.gif



 http://cdn.coresites.factorymedia.com/mpora_new/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/how-to-use-your-bike-as-a-weapon-2.gif


how to use your bike as a weapon 5



Bicicletta 8


Bicicletta 9




---------------------------------------











https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HSrN2X3WF0

THE SPANISH METHODS WENT OVER TO ARGENTINA, WHERE THERE WAS A 'CULTURE OF BLOOD AND STEEL', AND THINGS GOT 'USED AND TESTED' EXTENSIVELY, SHALL WE SAY :)





Knife Attack


 MODERN PRISON-INFLUENCED TECHNIQUES



----------------------




 
 



 IN KNIFE PLAY, AS WELL AS SELF DEFENCE METHODS FROM THE LATE 19TH/EARLY 20TH CENTURY USED A SIMPLE HAT AS A SHIELD, A 'BLINDER' OR AS A DISTRACTION.



-----------------



I HAVE THROWN HOT DRINKS OVER PEOPLE TWICE BEFORE;
ONCE IN AN AGGRESSIVE GUY'S FACE (WHO MUST JUST HAVE BEEN ACTING/FRONTING/POSTURING- BECAUSE HE BACKED DOWN AFTER I CHUCKED HOT COFFEE IN HIS FACE!) AND ANOTHER TIME AS AN ASSAULT ON A GUY WHO HAD DONE SOMETHING HORRIBLE (I USED A PRISON TRICK OF FILLING HOT BLACK COFFEE WITH LOTS OF SUGAR, WITH THE IDEA THAT IT WOULD STICK TO HIS SHIRT- WORKED EITHER WAY).



-------------



FINALLY, THE USE OF FEINTS, FLICKS, JABS AND DISTRACTIONS IS SOMETHING TO BE FOUND IN SOPHISTICATED/SKILLED COMBAT AT ALL TIMES, AND IN ALL PLACES.



 



A METHOD I'VE USED MORE THAN ONCE IS FROM OLD SAVATE;
WHERE YOU FEINT HIGH WITH THE HANDS AND THEN KICK LOW.

I'VE AT LEAST TWICE DONE THIS, ONCE DROPPING THE GUY WITH A KICK TO THE BALLS, AND THE OTHER TIME JUST DOUBLING HIM OVER, VERY UNCOMFORTABLE AND NO LONGER KEEN TO APPROACH ME. :)



ANOTHER FEINT I'VE USED TWICE IN THE STREET IS TO DUCK DOWN SUDDENLY,
WHICH MADE THEM FOLLOW ME WITH THEIR EYES.
I WAS THEN ABLE TO USE THIS TO 'ROLL' BACK UPWARDS AND HIT THEM UNAWARES.

THE FIRST TIME, IT WAS AN ELBOW THAT KNOCKED THIS HORRIBLE GUY OUT BEFORE HE EVEN HIT THE GROUND, AND THE OTHER TIME WAS A STRAIGHT RIGHT THAT DROPPED THE FELLA.




WITH SOME CREATIVITY, QUICK THINKING AND 'TACTICAL INTELLIGENCE',
WE- LIKE ALL FIGHTERS IN HISTORY- CAN MAKE USE OF OBJECTS WITHIN OUR ENVIRONMENT, OBSTACLES, TERRAIN, DECEPTION AND UNEXPECTED MOVEMENT TO INCREASE OUR CHANCES AND DECREASE THOSE OF THE CRIMINAL/ENEMY.


SOMETIMES JUST A FEW INCHES OR SPLIT SECONDS CAN DECIDE THE OUTCOME OF A FIGHT, SO DO EVERYTHING YOU CAN TO MAKE THAT WORK IN YOUR FAVOUR....... ;)




---------------------------------



AS WITH EVERYTHING I TEACH, TRAIN, USE OR WRITE ABOUT,
WE MUST LOOK TO BOTH USE THE TACTICS AND TECHNIQUES OURSELVES, AND ALSO TO GUARD AGAINST THEM BEING USED ON US!  ;)

Saturday 5 September 2015

http://files.facenama.com/i/attachments/1/1344756621533893_thumb.jpg

I think this photo is of Charlemont, excecuting a beautiful chasse bas above the knee.
This is the same rangy stop hit used by (all time best?) MMA fighter, Jon Jones
http://i49.tinypic.com/2rzw32x.png

Form follows function, and the human body really hasn't changed that much (at all?!) in 100 years or so.
What worked then, works now- and what works now, worked then.

That's why it puzzles me, when my 'Nouveau-Bartitsu' is accused of not being 'historical' enough (or people say that Bartitsu/DDLR are not functional fighting methods for the modern day...)
http://www.douarnenez-boxe.com/pages/images/sbd-2821290.jpg
http://www.douarnenez-boxe.com/pages/images/cannesbd050.jpg
http://www.douarnenez-boxe.com/pages/images/cannesbd060.jpg
A criminal's street art is adopted by the police;
'1797 François Vidocq se serait initié aux techniques de la Savate et du chausson marin alors qu'il était détenu à la prison de Bicêtre, en suivant les cours de Jean Goupil, dit " le Saint-Georges de la Savate " qu'il connut en prison.
Il a pour compagnon de cellule un type curieux et redoutable bien connu des Parisiens (originaire de la place Maubeuge) et qui répond au nom de Colo, "c'était un querelleur fini, et il connaissait tous les trucs employés par les bandits qui cherchent à se tuer ".
Née de la rue et des bas-fonds de Paris, la Savate est devenue grâce à Vidocq et à ses nombreux auxiliaires (anciens compagnons de bagne repentis) une discipline majeure dans la formation au combat de l'ensemble des policiers de la capitale.
La Savate ne serait pas devenue ce qu'elle est aujourd'hui sans les apports successifs des grands maîtres qui ont jalonnés son histoire.'
'If your training in a combative sport then it might be an idea to think in terms of the street as in knife or multiples rather than just in terms of a sport . In that a lot of boxers , mma , muay thai ,grappling and submission fighters train and fight in a far too "take it easy " casual way rather than say sparring or rolling as if their opponent had a knife or they were fighting more than one man . If you seriously want to heighten those mental , perceptual , cognitive faculties and physical attributes upon which survival in any sense of the term depends then your going to have to find a way of raising your sense of urgency with regards to the guy your training with or fighting at the time . Knife and multiple attacker practices can help you do just that ...'
Steve Morris
'Those with neat and tidy brains train others to fight in neat and tidy ways .The trouble is fights are not neat and tidy events.'
Steve Morris
Some different thoughts and ideas on newaza for self defence.
My own priority is always to get up and escape, but in certain situations or for certain professions, that may not be possible.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCj0IfpFjqY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CusoFfBmTWU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjJOmj90Knw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeX1PyKKuYk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U96M9aJCsmo

 http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/513Y5356CEL._SX321_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

 Groundwork, and perhaps especially escaping from a dominant/strong top control/pin, is something that takes a lot of practice however- and like anything in life, is not guaranteed!
https://magazine.fighttimes.com/chapter-eleven-the-head-th…/

Years ago, after reading Geoff Thompson's technical tips, I used to train the (unattached) headbutt, head moving diagonally, left to right, with a left foot drop step (more or less with the same body mechanics as my favourite right cross), on one of those 'wave' punchbags, made of foam on a plastic, water-filled base.

It was very forgiving on my head (maybe not exactly so on the brain!), and the bag made a great 'crash/woosh' sound, which impressed the drug dealers that sold not far from my back door!

The headbutt thrown like this can drop a person or send them reeling back, and thrown deceptively should really shock them.
The key to using it well is to be non-telegraphic and explosive (as with any strike).

I used it 3 times, that I can remember, in instances where the other person was right 'in my face', nose to nose almost.
This is the classic time a headbutt is used, and is very common in Britain.


It may be the only thing left to you, if extremely close, or if you're hands are 'tied up'/held.

It should certainly make you less appealing to hold onto! ;)


 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4cUqpsczeI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVRVyMixy7I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7wvscGLoT0


 And for anyone who claims that my 'Nouveau Bartitsu' isn't 'historical' enough;

 http://www.bartitsu.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/headbutt.jpg

 https://defensedanslarue.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/m45.jpg?w=250&h=300
Great article.
I'm really interested in this Bridgeman Savate stuff.
I'll be buying their book, and look forward to learning more Emoticono smile
I may be wrong (it happens, occasionally!), but I think that 'kansetzu waza' means 'breaking techniques', not 'submission holds'.
'Tapping' an opponent to secure victory is only for sport combat, or an 'honourable challenge' (how many of the latter do you see, nowadays?!).
You cannot trust someone who has criminal assaulted or threatened you to 'honour' their apparent submission, once you let them go.

In self defence, a joint lock could be as part of a takedown or throw, or to damage/break the limb.
Choosing the third option; to hold/secure/restrain the opponent, is really dependant on circumstances, and tactical needs and considerations (it can be very risky).

Kansetsu waza
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge34hs-4PKk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otSAWYs7Qtw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMPllsGLisI
http://www.scuola-judo-tomita.com/gallerie_immagini/gallerie_kano_storiche/kano19.jpg

Jigoro Kano demonstrates a move that- while apparently illegal in modern judo- shows it's obvious potential for self defence (within the framework of more generalised skills, and of course after LOTS OF PRACTICE!).
I've not used this technique, not even practiced it in training (though I will give it a go, now!)- but any move that can secure an arm (which could hold a weapon), and then damage the elbow joint whilst simultaneously slamming the opponent's face into the floor HAS TO BE.........at least considered! Emoticono wink LOL

 Modern use in shiai
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkGSPn_yoLA
http://judoinfo.com/images/jujitsu1921.jpg
The first move is good for self defence; push him away, break his balance, get him defensive/reacting to you by STICKING YOUR FINGERS IN HIS EYES! Emoticono smile
The shoulder throw would take some training for anyone to be able to reliably pull off in a fight (especially without going to the ground yourself), and for a woman against an aggressive man, it would be even harder without a lot of training or a lot of luck.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/f0/47/f8/f047f8cf05f2d5d995993aa61b2a062e.jpg

It says, 'Kicking the footpad just below the kneecap is an effective measure of defence'.
I agree; I'd just do it with a chasse bas or coup de pied bas, rather than with the toes (as it seems she's doing in the picture), and then be ready to get away, kick again or hit with the hands.
Do unto others as they would do unto you.....
.....but do it first!
(The Golden Rule of combat)
'-'What's the Bayonet for?'
-'TO KILL!'
That's what the instructors had us shouting in reply,over and over again to that question.
We'd run up and down,do press ups,crawl through the mud and then,again-

-'What's the bayonet for?'
-'TO KILL!'
We'd scream,knowing that the whole point of this exercise was to get us knackered,pissed off,angry and to bring out the sort of aggression that could be handy in a bayonet fight at close quarters.
'You're not trying hard enough,back round the field!'
The sadistic instructors would merrily say.

Covered in mud and soaking combat dress,with wet heavy boots and heaving lungs,we did it AGAIN.

This time,
-'Right,what's the Bayonet for!'
-'TO KILL!'
-'Who you gonna kill!'
-'THE ENEMY!'
All these young,fit,aggressive and pissed off men would shout,ready to kill something(the training was working!).
Well,I say all the young men,but at least one of them(me)was shouting something else.
-'What's the Bayonet for?'
-'TO KILL!'
I'd yell with the others.
-'Who you gonna kill?'
-'ANYONE!'
I'd gleefully shout,trying not to show too much humour on my face(this was supposed to be dead serious).
'ANYONE!' sounded similar enough to 'THE ENEMY!',amongst 30/40 screaming voices that no-one else apparently noticed throughout the entire affair.

It kept me having fun,took the edge of the 'beasting',and actually reflected my thoughts at the time.
I really did mean 'ANYONE!'.
I've never chosen my allies or my enemies based on someone else's perspective.
If I got the chance to stick someone with 6-and-a-half inches of cold-steel,as they say,I'd do it because I joined the Army to fight,crawl in the mud and blow people up.
That's the truth.
As a teenager who had generally been a bit of a stranger in a crowd and fairly unhappy at home,
I wanted to express my feelings by eviscerating 'ANYONE!'.

I told my Mum before I left for training.
-'Mum,I'm joining the Army because I want to kill people'
-'Yes'
Not a flicker.
-'If I killed people as a civilian,they'd call me a murderer'
-'Yes'.
-'But if I kill people in the Army,they'll call me a hero'
-'Yes'
Still not a flicker.

'It's a strange world',I thought to myself.

Nowadays,I wouldn't want to kill just 'ANYONE!'.
If the need arose,I'd stick,shoot or blow up 'THE ENEMY!',should a real enemy(or threat)present.
Circumstances aside,I'd probably find it a meaningful and enriching experience,a 'manly' experience,and my 'duty'-if it was what was NEEDED.

On that cold,wet morning in that field,though-the only thing I 'killed' was an 'ENEMY!' made of Hessian sacks and stuffing,on a wooden frame.
You should have seen it,though-WHAT A FIGHT!

And I NEARLY won! ; )'


'Derek Crankshaft' 2010

 http://personalsurvivalblog.blogspot.co.uk/2010_05_01_archive.html
Really great video, both from the technical and the psychological perspective.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plxlf9vRzkY&app=desktop
'Most anxiety problems are based on a "fear of fear " .In other words a fear of those sensations associated with the fear of fighting .Exposure to the sensations of fear allows you to habituate to these sensations .In that the only way you realistically learn to manage and positively frame those anxieties associated with your fear of fighting is to fight .The more you are exposed to what you fear the less aroused the nervous system becomes to the same stimuli .Thereby leaving more energy to be focused on what needs to be focused on with regards to your survival .However most people try to cope with their feelings of anxiety by avoiding situations that elicit such feelings. The problem is avoidance prevents the nervous system from habituating to fearful situations . Such avoidance can not only lead to your fear of fighting becoming more pronounced but also to relying on a host of psychological compensatory crutches or ploys of one form or another .The trouble is if you keep avoiding what scares you not only does that fear become more established but deep down your going to know that your a complete fucking failure despite your grades , titles and international fame .Only by repeatedly confronting your fears will you learn to develop those skills by which to gain control over your anxieties and become more empowered and confident .The only way through this particular psychological minefield is a deliberate straight line and not by avoiding such a minefield or replacing it with some psuedo combative martial art or self protection shite ..'
Steve Morris
'PREVENTION BETTER THAN CURE
As Geoff Thompson pointed out in one of his books;
Do you train your child to look left and right,and to cross the road safely,or you just train them how to take the impact of an oncoming car,and hope that's enough?

This he said in relation to people's focus on physical self-defence(or by my extension,any emergency/survival theme).
So many people go to a karate class,or buy a fire extinguisher or burglar alarm but then don't take appropriate steps to AVOID the undesirable situations happening in the first place.

A brutal and unannounced attack,a fire or a burglary are not things we wish to face(or a kid getting hit by a car of course).
An ounce of preparation is worth a pound of cure(at least).

That karate class probably won't be much use if you're pissed and alone in the wrong place Friday night.'

Derek Crankshaft

 http://personalsurvivalblog.blogspot.co.uk/2010/05/steel-sharpens-steel_07.html
I finally got a tyre system set up in the local park, and was hitting away with the cane, with my healthier (but clumsier and weaker) left hand. Emoticono smile
Charles from the Metropolitan Bartitsu Club was right about the sound it would make. LOL I can definitely feel it in my shoulder now, too (I'll have to balance doing that with my boxing training, as I've got to look after 'meself', with the advancing years...). I've basically got like a cargo strap from a lorry, with which I can tie the tyre (which has a brick and sandbags strapped with bungees inside it) from branches for hitting with hands/elbows/weapons, or around trunks of trees for savate low-kicks. Today, I was practicing chasse bas and coup de pied bas, with set-ups with the hands. Even after one session with James Southwood http://londonsavate.co.uk/ my technique feels improved, even if I have to go through the 'fancy prancy' assaut stuff to get it.
From next week, I will be training boxing, wrestling, savate and la canne Vigny/Bartitsu at dedicated clubs, and self defence and 'Nouveau-Bartitsu' stuff with my own 'Modern Antagonistics' group.
Exciting stuff! Emoticono smile

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Modern-Antagonistics/1475307999457462?ref=ts&fref=ts
'VIOLENCE.
I've lived in some places where violence was a 'normal' way of people communicating.
The risk of being in the middle when it 'kicked off' was ever present.
As a result,everyone was switched on and 'keyed up'.
The result of that tension and expectancy was often a shorter fuse,if you like-and people tended to err on the side of caution and 'go' a little earlier than they otherwise might.
Flight often was difficult,because the center of activity was where we lived.
It was possible,but within a community with numerous predators-LONG TERM one could be better off NOT leaving the scene on terms of perceived 'weakness',as this could set you up as a target later.
I fought-in fairness-too much,and sort of painted myself into a corner.
If I suddenly changed my tactic and tried to 'blend in' and be passive/submissive,people would have seen this as a moment to make their bid(just like dogs).
I had made enemies,and had to live with the results.
Eventually(as has happened a few times),I actually had groups 'looking for me'.
The best I could hope for was to carry a weapon,use it and probably end up in prison for a long time.
The worst,kicked into a coma or stabbed to death.
Either way,living waiting for that wasn't an option.
I was ready to leave the country anyway(I've never liked living in Britain),and this was the spur I needed.
So,this time I chose 'flight'(literally,from Gatwick!).
Basically then,we have 3 options when it comes to dealing with aggression/threat;
FIGHT,FLIGHT or FREEZE.
All 3 CAN have their place,but if the 'kick off' is unavoidable,only the first two are valid.
It can work to just cover up and 'ride' the kicking,but it's hardly the option of choice if we can do otherwise.
One only has to look at the rate of success(or failiure)of the freeze tactic employed by many people in the face of aggression.
It doesn't help them.
There's no honour these days in your average attacker,and submissiveness generally won't win a person anything more than a brutal and sustained beating.
Fight and flight have their place,and it's really up to each one of us to decide that place.
Ideally the best strategy is avoidance.
I'm frankly sick of violence,and am pretty careful where I go and who I talk with.
If I need to fight,I'd rather get it over and done with quickly,and have no compassion for a predator.
As with all survival,the mindset we have is the key to victory.
I'm not going to write any more on this subject here.
Books like 'Streetwise' by Peter Consterdine,'Dead or Alive' by Geoff Thompson and the excellent website and Forum of Dennis Martin spell things out better than I ever could.
All 3 of these men have extensive experience dealing professionally with violence,and provide the foundation for any 'system' we can build.
Check out these sources of info.,factor awareness and preparedness into your survival mindset and good luck!'

'Derek Crankshaft'

 http://personalsurvivalblog.blogspot.co.uk/2010/04/violence.html
'GUARANTEES.
There really are NO guarantees in this life.
We can improve our chances immensely, but just remember NO MATTER how switched on, determined,tough and strong you are...

SOMETIMES YOU GET THE BEAR,
SOMETIMES THE BEAR GETS YOU!'

Derek Crankshaft

 http://personalsurvivalblog.blogspot.co.uk/2010/04/guarantees.html
'Survival seems to be a much used word,nowadays.
If you turn on the TV there's this 'expert' and that 'expert',showing the world this technique and that technique and impressing the pants off the gullible or inexperienced with their pre-planned,edited and in many cases fake acts of 'survival' and general action-manliness.
There's a huge market for this kind of stuff-and the undiscerning and/or just plain lazy lap it all up.
It might entertain some,but how real is it-and how relevant is it for most of us?
Firstly,I'd like to comment on the very term,'Survival'.
The definition/s I've found that I most like so far,are from an online dictionary and really pretty simple;
1)The act or process of surviving.
2)The fact of having survived.
Survival is not some modern invention folks,neither is it a specialist skill,or a hobby or a subculture.
It's what ANY LIVING THING does(or doesn't),every moment of it's life.
Sure,wilderness survival and extreme survival etc.,are very valid disciplines/subjects of which if I'm honest I know very little(I told you I was no expert!),and need to learn alot more.
There are people out there with great knowledge and skillsets,some with real experience and I'd guess fewer still with both.
There are fire officers,emergency medical technicians,trauma surgeons,S+R guys etc.,that are indeed experts in surviving and helping others do the same.
In a warzone,you'd guess experienced soldiers have an edge(or the normal folk who go about their lives in the same environment-without weapons,or specialist training,or equipment,or logistical support).
On 'the mean streets',maybe police(para-military or otherwise).
The meaner the streets,though-the less likely this is.
Small children play in places that are 'no-go' areas for elite and heavily armed law officers.
'Survival' then,is something we're all doing until we die.
Each of us is different,and what works for one person in one situation may well not work elsewhere.
The only 'expert' in our survival can only ever be us,from the moment we leave the 'nest'.
This is why I felt the need to start this blog.
I have survived so far,and aim to survive a little longer if at all possible.
I was looking at the world we live in,the challenges facing us individually and as a species.
I was thinking how UNEQUIPPED,mentally or otherwise the VAST majority of us are to survive the kind of threats to life that seem to be sweeping over us like some kind of nightmare.
I realised-and realise-that I have ALOT to learn,and alot to do if I want to carry on living,hopefully raise children that can carry on,and so on.
Given a couple of centuries,I'm guessing the world will be a pretty different place from that of today.
Sure,any of us can survive purely on luck(and we shouldn't underestimate that very important factor!)-but if we really want to stand a fair chance of 'survival',both personally and as a species,
we ALL need to become 'experts'.
AND QUICK!'
'Derek Crankshaft'

 http://personalsurvivalblog.blogspot.co.uk/2010/02/blog-post.html
'Hi,and welcome to the world famous 'Personal Survival Blog'.
Actually,it's not really famous-I'm only just starting.
As one boxing commentator said 'He's not even a household name in his own household!'
My aim here is to basically write down,and hopefully learn,a little bit about personal survival.
I'm not in any way,shape or form a 'survival expert'-but when it comes to our own PERSONAL survival,we've each got different strategies,aims and ideas.
In this way,I guess I am an expert-in MY OWN personal survival.

We live in rapidly changing times,with many threats and complications to survival,as well as surely many possibilities,too.
Hopefully,in researching,analyzing,EXPERIMENTING(!)and discussing-something can be learned.
By me.
And if anyone else gets even the smallest thing from reading this blog-it's an added extra.'

'Derek Crankshaft'
http://personalsurvivalblog.blogspot.co.uk/2010/02/hola.html
I'm gonna quote myself, because I reckon it makes a good soundbite (!)
'A central concern for me is personal security for the 'weaker' and/or less aggressive members of society. For healthy men of fighting age, though- there's only one way to prepare...'
Modern Antagonistics
I've not looked at this little blog in years, so it might be embarrassing, but it'll also contain something of interest (if anyone can be 'arsed' to read it! LOL)

 http://personalsurvivalblog.blogspot.co.uk/2010_02_01_archive.html


Derek Crankshaft/Kemlyn Munn/Modern Antagonistics
'El hombre sin nombre'....... (o, con MUCHOS nombres?! ja ja)
The Test
By Carl Cestari
"Will this work so that I can use it instinctively in vital combat against an opponent who is determined to prevent me from doing so, and who is striving to eliminate me by fair means or foul". ~ Rex Applegate
It really does NOT matter one iota what style, system, method, or technique you MAY wish to apply to your personal survival training.
What DOES matter is, if "whatever" it is that you choose passes the above TEST.
This requires HONEST self-appraisal first and foremost. Forget how you would LIKE the world to be; see the world as it really is.
And look at yourself in the same light.
I've "learned" thousands of techniques over the years. I practice about a dozen (striking and grappling) on a daily basis.
I have been ruthless in rejecting ANY technique or method that DOES NOT pass Applegate's "test".
We can take a page from "combat" sports here:
Boxers, wrestlers, and Judokas ALL have that one "Sunday punch". One technique that they have drilled and practiced and drilled and practiced. And generally these "techniques" as applied to each specific sport are repeated over and over.
Why? Because these few methods have the BEST overall track record of success.
Even the NHB and UFC type matches reflect this pattern. Watch hundreds of these bouts and you will see a definitive pattern of decisive winning techniques. And they are very few in number.
So it is with boxing, wrestling, Judo AND street-fighting.
Georges Carpentier was a champion Savateur and boxer. He was KNOWN for his right hand KO power and technique. He called this punch his "whip punch"; his bread and butter, his Sunday "best". He said that it took him TEN years of hard work before he felt he really "mastered" this ONE technique.
There is a vital fundamental lesson there.
So the next time you "learn" some technique, run it through the mill of the "test". And be honest about it.
J. Cristopher Amberger on Singlestick
'The use of the point was re-introduced and cuts at the legs were allowed (although they were considered foul play by many salles.) Hutton recounts an incident at Henry Angelo's St. James's Street School of Arms in the late 1850s, when a Mr. Rolland squared off against a notorious bully, non-commissioned officer in the Royal Artillery Sergeant T-y, who had unfairly beaten Rolland in a previous encounter by cutting "inside the leg," even though both combatants had agreed on regarding this action as foul play.
The pair engaged; the sergeant led off in his customary violent fashion, but Mr. Rolland played in a manner that had never been seen before. This time he was serious. Usually he would lead off with a frank attack; now he was strangely quiet. He parried the furious blows, and only now and then replied with a riposte. T-y, fancying that this man was afraid of him, redoubled his energy, and gradually tired himself, which was exactly what his opponent intended he should do. At last the supreme moment arrived. Rolland all of a sudden crouched like a tiger, like a tiger sprang forward and with all the force of his spring and the weight of his mighty arm landed a fearful blow exactly on the point of the inside of his adversary's knee. The biter was bit. Sergeant T-y uttered a shriek of agony, and fell fainting on the floor. He was carried to the dressing-room, where they fomented his leg with hot water and did the best they could for him at the moment. He was taken in a cab to the hospital where he remained over a month, and it was three months before he was able to mount a horse again.
The hit didn't improve the Sergeant's salle manners. In a later incident, an opponent's singlestick broke off at the buffalo-hide hilt. T-y took advantage of the situation to land several vicious hits on his unarmed opponent. Seeing himself abused in this unfair and ungentlemanly fashion, his victim used the basket the way many soldiers used their hilts in close combat, namely to land a tremendous punch against the face of T-y that sent him sprawling to the floor. Angelo, who had been watching the encounter, added a kick for good measure and told T-y to pack and never show his face again at his school.'
'The weapon is a good stout ash-stick with a large basket-handle ... The players are called "old gamesters," -why, I can't tell you,- and their object is simply to break one another's heads: for the moment that blood runs an inch anywhere above the eyebrow, the old gamester to whom it belongs is beaten, and has to stop. A very slight blow with the sticks will fetch blood, so that it is by no means a punishing pastime, if the men don't play on purpose, and savagely, at the body and arms of their adversaries.'

Thomas Hughes
'....exercises that give health, vigor and a manly gait and elasticity to the body, inspire the individual with a contempt of danger, and initiate him into the system of self-defence, ought by no means to be neglected.
The various gymnastic exercises, such as wrestling, running, leaping, swimming, single sticks, and boxing, should either partly or in whole form a portion of the code.....for by means of this, boys not only acquire a manly and dignified attitude, but their health is materially promoted....'
The Pamphleteer, 1827
Archie Moore scored a record 130 KOs in his career,
and like any mongoose, it was his blending of offence with defence that made him a killer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMqv5avW2mo
'You have to force your opponent in some way to always be trying to perceptually , cognitively , physiologically , biomechanically ,tactically and strategically catch up with you rather than the other way around.'
Steve Morris
'Pattern recognition and response networks have to be trained within actual hostile environments or accurate replications of such environments . In other words they cant be realistically trained within safe, predictable drills.'
Steve Morris
'The guiding principle that underlies all fight training is to train as you need to fight. That means mentally and physically preparing to take on someone who can fight in the multidimensional sense of the term, and not training to beat up some legless drunk on a Saturday night, or to touch someone in a game of tag—where’s the challenge in that?'
Steve Morris
'Making your own luck ....Better to have your opponent reacting to you in some way than you to your opponent'
Steve Morris
ROMANTIC HEMA?!

I'm interested in combat, both historical and modern, because violence is part of the human (and animal) condition, and I wish to stay safe- and to help others stay safe- from said violence.
I wonder how many of the HEMA and other martial arts folks who fantasise about and play at fighting really think deeply about (and would be immediately prepared for) HURTING, breaking, smashing, cutting and hacking another human being to pieces (smelling it, seeing victims convulse and shudder, hearing moans, screams and gurgles).
I know that I myself would be prepared for this in a necessary context; as I've done a reasonable (some would argue 'UNreasonable'!) degree of that before! (That doesn't mean I necessarily WANT to or would ENJOY doing it again, though).

These people who seem to think that 'historical' violence was somehow more glamorous, more romantic or even (heaven forbid!) 'quainter' than what can be seen on the nightly news, youtube , the slums or ghettos of any city or even a British town centre at the weekend, would probably be the first to be really shocked and traumatised if they saw or had to do the sort of things their 'heroes' or 'favourite characters' had done.

They're like little boys playing at being soldiers.

Looking at some of the artistic representations in the link (which I've chosen for their fidelity to violence I have seen and been involved in), I personally look at them and know that I wouldn't want to be part of ANY of those scenes- not as victim, victor or in the case that those two roles are still 'up in the air'!

 http://modernantagonistics.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/romantic-hema.html


People with safe lives, sterile imaginations and a lack of guts play at violence, while harbouring a deep terror of it (some sort of psychological displacement activity, I would guess).
Many people around the world have and do hurt others, and are hurt by others, and know that it's not romantic (unless they are either psychotic, or going through a youthful 'killer' phase).

There is hope, however.
Maybe those who have led protected, sheltered lives can 'cross the rubicon' and train with enough fury, intensity, cruelty and VIOLENCE, that they will grow up from their childish daydreams, and actually become MEN who can protect (or otherwise), maybe even like their 'heroes'......
The United States Armed Forces use the following principles of war:
OBJECTIVE – Direct every military operation toward a clearly defined, decisive and attainable objective. The ultimate military purpose of war is the destruction of the enemy's ability to fight and will to fight.
OFFENSIVE – Seize, retain, and exploit the initiative. Offensive action is the most effective and decisive way to attain a clearly defined common objective. Offensive operations are the means by which a military force seizes and holds the initiative while maintaining freedom of action and achieving decisive results. This is fundamentally true across all levels of war.
MASS – Mass the effects of overwhelming combat power at the decisive place and time. Synchronizing all the elements of combat power where they will have decisive effect on an enemy force in a short period of time is to achieve mass. Massing effects, rather than concentrating forces, can enable numerically inferior forces to achieve decisive results, while limiting exposure to enemy fire.
ECONOMY OF FORCE – Employ all combat power available in the most effective way possible; allocate minimum essential combat power to secondary efforts. Economy of force is the judicious employment and distribution of forces. No part of the force should ever be left without purpose. The allocation of available combat power to such tasks as limited attacks, defense, delays, deception, or even retrograde operations is measured in order to achieve mass elsewhere at the decisive point and time on the battlefield. ...
MANEUVER – Place the enemy in a position of disadvantage through the flexible application of combat power. Maneuver is the movement of forces in relation to the enemy to gain positional advantage. Effective maneuver keeps the enemy off balance and protects the force. It is used to exploit successes, to preserve freedom of action, and to reduce vulnerability. It continually poses new problems for the enemy by rendering his actions ineffective, eventually leading to defeat. ...
SECURITY – Never permit the enemy to acquire unexpected advantage. Security enhances freedom of action by reducing vulnerability to hostile acts, influence, or surprise. Security results from the measures taken by a commander to protect his forces. Knowledge and understanding of enemy strategy, tactics, doctrine, and staff planning improve the detailed planning of adequate security measures.
SURPRISE – Strike the enemy at a time or place or in a manner for which he is unprepared. Surprise can decisively shift the balance of combat power. By seeking surprise, forces can achieve success well out of proportion to the effort expended. Surprise can be in tempo, size of force, direction or location of main effort, and timing. Deception can aid the probability of achieving surprise.
SIMPLICITY – Prepare clear, uncomplicated plans and concise orders to ensure thorough understanding. Everything in war is very simple, but the simple thing is difficult. To the uninitiated, military operations are not difficult. Simplicity contributes to successful operations. Simple plans and clear, concise orders minimize misunderstanding and confusion.
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/04/the_feeling_and_1.html
'Take a strong wrestler, get them tired, and they aren't as strong.
Take a quick wrestler, get them tired, and they aren't as quick.
Take a technical wrestler, get them tired, and they aren't as technical.
No matter what kind of wrestler, everyone is afraid of getting tired.
It's those who learn to perform when they're tired that find success.'
J.Robinson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olpmZTFoAPE
http://www.e-reading.club/bookreader.php/107333/Vzryvnoii_udar_i_aktivnaya_oborona.pdf

A classic text all-round.
The fifth section of the book, 'Differences between Fist-Fighting and Boxing' (page 7) is my favourite.
Dempsey was famous as a boxer, but also had a history as an experienced street fighter and challenge fighter.
He lived life rough on the roads, and experienced poverty, danger and hardship.
He was intense, determined and ruthless in the ring; as evidenced by round one of the fight below.
Some claim he may have 'doctored' his hand wraps or gloves in some way before this fight (a report described Willard, 'One of his cheekbones had caved in. His jaw was broken, as was his nose. His ribs were busted. Many of his teeth had been knocked out…').
Whether he did or didn't 'cheat', he left a lasting impression on the world, and was a great inspiration of a later, vicious destroyer, Mike Tyson.

Both Dempsey and Tyson (like many boxers) came from the street, from the gutter.
They clawed their ways up, and did whatever it took to survive and succeed.

Life, unlike boxing, has no rule book....
'My investigation of technique took me on a long mental journey as I followed my fighting trail through the West, where I had worked at any job I could get in mines, lumber camps, hash houses, on ranches, etc.
I was fighting on the side in those days, and I was getting pointers on self-defence from all the old-timers I met.
Each trainer, each manager, each fighter had his own ideas, and his own specialities.
Like a blotter on legs, I absorbed all that information in those days, and discarded what seemed wrong.'
Jack Dempsey
SOME THOUGHTS REGARDING 'STANCE'
I'm currently absorbed in learning and training boxing, freestyle wrestling, savate and Vigny cane fighting.
That's probably enough to be going on with (at one time!) and adding jiujitsu and 'street' tactics and methods (multiple opponents, weapons, 'dirty' fighting) rounds this kind of approach off nicely.
This is why I've subtitled my first workshop 'MMA for the Street';
a range and mix of styles and arts can allow us to develop 'bespoke' systems and plans for our individual self protection needs (which vary, from person to person).
This may in a way seem like it has nothing to do with the title of this thread; the key word of which is 'stance'.
I've been thinking about this recently, what with having to shift, adapt and tailor the way I move and operate, between different classes and sparring sessions.
Boxing has it's 'orthodoxy' as regards fighting stance; from foot position, to where and how the hands are held, etc. Wrestling, too- although this sport seems to allow (require?) a little more FLUIDITY and less RIGIDITY as to how you stand and move.
Modern savate and La Canne Vigny (as I'm being taught it, through Bartitsu sources) suffer from that old pitfall of 'form' and 'aesthetics'; where the positions are dictated possibly as much by rules and/or philosophy as by what the changing dynamic of a fight dictates.
I used a word in the last paragraph; 'positions'.
This seems a much more useful, and indeed accurate, term for
the ways we stand and move, that allow us to operate our defense and offense, and shut down those of the opponent/s, as successfully as possible.
Beginners may be taught 'stances' and technique ('keep your hands up!', 'don't step through with your cross!', 'don't cross your feet!') that have a very solid reason and function- but not one that you'll necessary ALWAYS see demonstrated by very successful people within the sports/arts.
Combat is a dynamic affair; often to the point of chaos (outside of the gym/hall/ring/dojo/mat, this is CERTAINLY the case).
A 'stance', as it's often understood, CANNOT by definition be 'how we fight'- because to fight, you have to actually MOVE at some point! LOL
So, they represent 'positions', that may fleetingly (or for longer periods) provide some benefits and some possibilities within the open-ended, complex 'violent puzzle'.
But the 'best' position in some cases, just happens to be the one we actually find ourselves in, at the moment we need to- or are best able to- act.
If we were focused on the best possible stance, for me it would be something like, for example, looking down the scope of a sniper rifle, while my opponent is stood taking a piss, or that my opponent is drunk and asleep, and I'm looming above him with a crowbar.
'Stances' and 'form' etc., may be used as MODELS for some useful elements of positions, but to get obsessed with recreating them perfectly, is to miss the idea that what we're trying to do is hit and not get hit, or dominate the opponent so completely that he has no chance.
We may well not succeed in that, but that's what we're looking for (that or just escaping), in every instance; to facilitate our own work and negate the enemy's.
We should never forget that most martial arts and combat sports have been designed, developed and are practiced- at least in part- with spectators in mind.
They contain an element of ENTERTAINMENT; of 'SHOW'.
If we're looking to dissuade or deter an attacker (potential or otherwise), then display has it's place.
Likewise, when we are feinting, drawing or otherwise looking to deceive or manipulate the other.
Boxers talk about giving the opponent different 'looks', for them to try to work out.
The bottom line is, though, that the best 'position' to use is the one (or ANY one!) that actually works in a given moment.
This is one of the great things we're seeing from MMA.
The mixture of different approaches, abilities and challenges 'thrown into the mix' means that a consistently successful fighter has to be able to be CREATIVE, and adapt to situations and seize opportunities quickly and effectively.
Beginners learn techniques, whereas it's so many different 'intangible' factors and experience, talent and intuition (and some luck?!) that lead to their successful use.
A fight might look beautiful (if you're lucky), but it'll more probably look (and feel) like a mess.
Being able to impose and/or seize your will or goals in this storm is what will (or won't) lead to your survival or victory (sometimes the two are the same thing).
Form should follow function; and NOT the other way round....
https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/…/11960098_10808436552…
This photo of Carl Cestari represents the type of savate I'm more interested in; not the prancy, fancy assaut stuff I'm currently learning.
I'm gaining insights, attributes and technical details that will help my development, no doubt; but if I'm looking at a sporting model of savate, the sort of thing I'd want to be doing is more like what you see Jon Jones do in the UFC.
He uses stiff chasse bas and coup de pied bas low kicks, keeping the distance, stopping his opponent getting set and ultimately threatening to destroy the knee joint.

It's not meant to be f**king ballet!
'Grip fighting is about being the first to establish a controlling grip on your opponents wrist/fingers or the end of his sleeve in some way (one or two hands) that prevents or checks him from getting a counter grip on you with the same or other hand or closing with you .And then from that position of control establish a second grip if necessary from which to gain further control of your opponents body to make a throw or take down . All of which of course needs to be done with the idea of controlling your opponents positional alignment and balance without allowing him to control yours .In other words you must not let him put a hand on you even for a fraction of a second from which he can gain control or threaten you position and balance in some way . Thats why its called a hand or grip fight and the closer you let your opponent get to you the easier it will be for him to establish the first grip or a 50/50 counter grip .Spacial recognition , positional relationship , timing ,dynamic balance , draws , traps , evasive skills etc etc are just as important in hand fighting as they are in more open stand up striking positions ...'
Steve Morris
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCpi0AbItWw
http://modernantagonistics.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/irish-stickfighting.html
'There is no manœuvre in the whole art of boxing
that is so timely and useful as the one known as “side-
slipping.” '
William Edwards
---

 http://www.albion-prints.com/ekmps/shops/albionprint/images/boxing-print-1893-slipping.-antique-39647-p%5Bekm%5D416x554%5Bekm%5D.jpg

 http://www.albion-prints.com/ekmps/shops/albionprint/images/Boxing-1893-Antique-Print.-The-Side-step-158519-p%5Bekm%5D416x554%5Bekm%5D.jpg
"The older works expounded the art of fighting generally; taught the reader a number of valuable, if not 'gentlemanlike,' dodges for overcoming an adversary at all manner of weapons."
Egerton Castle
'The style was known for its use of sticks, the short staff in particular. Most speak of a stick that was about a meter long. Countless youth of the time became experts in its use. Old timers I have met still talk of using their stick to fight off Arabs with knives.
One of the uniquely Israeli applications of this stick fighting was the aggressive, offensive nature of the training and of its use. Practitioners describe that when an attacker appeared someone would shout "The enemy is here!" and the practitioners would raise up their sticks in one hand while the other hand was ready for action as well. You do not run away. You face him straight on and make it clear you are not afraid. You wave your stick at him.'
Some Israeli guy...

 http://modernantagonistics.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/israeli-stickfighting-from-langvigny.html
'Judo had its origin in the ancient Japanese art of jujutsu, a system of hand-to-hand combat. The bushi of feudal Japan (samurai) are usually credited for developing jujutsu (at their time the art was known as Yoroi kumi-uchi, a grappling method for fighters fully clad in Japanese armor). However, the Nihon Shoki (the Chronicle of the Japanese nation) documents public unarmed competitions (hikara-kurabe) dating back to 230 B.C.
Jujutsu has been known by several names throughout Japanese history: taijutsu, yawara, kempo, kugusoku, kumiuchi, koshinomawan. What is unique to the art is that one did not use brute strength to overpower an opponent, but rather skill, finesse and flexibility. Economy of energy, balance, and grace were the outstanding hallmarks of the good jujutsu practitioner. Unlike the Western hand-to-hand fighter, the jujutsu fighter was expected to be soft and pliable, winning by appearing to yield.
In classical form, during the feudal period, jujutsu was part of the bushi training, along with archery, spearfighting, swordsmanship, horsemanship, maneuvering, and etiquette. Its importance grew with the rise of the bushi class after the late Heian period. Throughout subsequent periods of Japanese history (Kamakura, 1185-1336; Muromachi, 1336-1573 into the Tokugawa period, 1603-1868) the art became more diversified and specialized, being taught in schools (ryus). Ryus organized around different aspects of the art, perpetuating their founders' vision.
The schools differed in emphasis and strategy. Some specialized in throwing (nage), others in groundwork (osae, shime, kansetsu), and others in striking (atemi). In matters of strategy, some schools valued taking the initiative in combat while others preferred timely reaction to an opponent's aggression. Those that followed the principles of swordsmanship insisted on sudden, total attack. Others preferred to neutralize the opponent's attack once it was in motion.
Given the constant state of war in Japanese feudal history, ryus tested their vision of jujutsu on the battlefield, where the premium was on survival. The three hundred years of peace that followed the Japanese civil wars led to a change in the nature of the art. Under the harsh Tokugawa martial codes combats between bushi became rarer and heavy warfare far less frequent. On the other hand, unarmed combat became more common. The rise of the common citizen at the end of the period required that jujutsu techniques be adapted to the needs of everyday life.
At that time, several ryus lost their insistence on ceremonial or ritual posturing in favor of a more practical approach to hand-to-hand combat. By the end of the Tokugawa period, the ancient martial arts of Japan (Bujutsu) created for the warrior class began to lose importance as the martial ways (Budo) created for the commoner gained ascendancy. Budo was not simply a collection of fighting techniques but also a spiritual discipline, a way of life.
During the Meiji Restoration after 1868, the transition from Bujutsu to Budo was completed. Several branches of the martial arts changed names and orientation entirely. Kyujutsu became Kyudo, iai-jutsu became iaido, aiki-jutsu became aikido, and jujutsu became Judo. There was a shift from warfare techniques to everyday life principles, with the spiritual side of the arts being more emphasized. Schools now passed their tradition to students in the form of techniques, philosophy and codes of ethics. Students were expected to be fully versed on hand-to-hand combat, but also to embody the philosophy of the ryu's founders.'
Keo Cavalcanti
Tactical positioning is so fundamental to combat, yet often quite ignored or misunderstood by people who have never ACTUALLY engaged in combat (this includes most people who dream or fantasise about, 'practice' and even TEACH- but are scared stiff by- combat...! LOL)
Well, perhaps the wannabees and theoreticians (you know who you are! Emoticono wink ) might actually have found a very functional 'range' from which to conduct their 'self pretence' skills-
IT'S CALLED THE INTERNET! ha ha ha
Just had a great 'chinwag' over coffee with Arnold Wyvern, and we'll be convening the first meeting of the 'Modern Antagonistics' group in the next couple of weeks (in South London).
First session will cover tactical positioning; that essential and fundamental concept that enables us to escape, hit without being hit (ideally!) or attain a dominant angle/line/spot.
It's no good having all the best techniques in the world, if we're not in the right place to use them! Emoticono smile

From the sporting side of things, we will be looking to 'play' with and construct/deconstruct elements of boxing from the days of the 'London Prize Ring' rules.

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/London_Prize_Ring_Rules

Anyone interested can contact me via this Facebook page,
or through modernantagonistics@yahoo.com

This will be a training group and 'combat lab', rather than a traditional 'class' or school.
Any and all reasonable and respectful insights, suggestions and methods will be considered and tested.
Only cost will be an even split of the training hall fees.
Marcus Senior found this 1887 photo sequence of boxing's cross-buttock throw

 http://www.gallery.ca/cybermuse/servlet/imageserver?src=WI724790&ext=x.jpg

Friday 4 September 2015

'NOUVEAU-BARTITSU', my central project and upcoming course, is based on Bartitsu, Defense Dans La Rue and other fighting arts and self defence systems of the late 19th/early 20th Centuries.

As during that period, all of my tactics and methods are designed for avoiding, escaping, deterring, surviving or (last resort) FIGHTING against a ruthless, brutal and determined criminal assault.

Unfortunately, most reconstructions of Victorian fighting arts come across as something of a novelty or a joke, with period dress, a crude mimicry of 'genteel' or 'quaint' behaviour and a self-conscious sense of 'irony', that bears no relation to the horrific and life changing violence these systems were designed to combat.


My interest in these systems is far from academic, as I have used much of what I teach myself, to survive, dominate and WIN in environments most 'antagonistics' fans would rather pretend did not exist.

Taking the rich and complete skills and tactics from our original source material, I am constantly refining, testing and blending those elements of the 'base arts' (boxing, jujitsu, savate, wrestling, cane/umbrella and other improvised weapons) that are proven to work against people that are trying to hurt us; whether in the ring, on the mat or in our daily lives.


The only way we can improve our personal security, is by analysing, observing and changing our environments and our habits.

The only way we can improve our chances of surviving a committed and savage criminal assualt is by FIGHTING-
AND THE ONLY WAY ANYONE CAN EVER LEARN TO FIGHT IS............BY FIGHTING!


This is an uncomfortable truth and reality, that 99% of martial arts and 'self pretence' courses (as I call them!) are designed to AVOID.

They will teach you easy, straightforward, failsafe 'tricks', that apparently will- as if by magic- overcome a physically and mentally stronger opponent/s, who has likely learned and experienced violence and criminality their whole lives.


CRIMINAL ATTACKERS ARE NOT LIKE COMPLIANT, HELPFUL TRAINING PARTNERS, OR LUDICROUS STOOGES WHO FALL OVER AT THE SLIGHTEST OPPORTUNITY!

I know, because I spent many years immersed in a culture where extreme violence and predation were the norm.


I didn't survive that world because I'm superhuman (I'm not!),
or because I have some 'secret' that renders attackers helpless-
I SURVIVED BECAUSE I LEARNED TO BE SWITCHED ON, MENTALLY PREPARED, AND TO USE SIMPLE, BASIC, PROVEN SKILLS AND TACTICS, BACKED UP BY RUTHLESSNESS, RAPIDITY OF THOUGHT AND ACTION AND AN ANIMAL AGGRESSION FOUNDED ON A DESPERATE NEED TO SURVIVE...


These abilities and qualities can be learned and improved, by anyone who is sufficiently concerned about their wellbeing and safety, and that of their families, to invest the time, energy, thought and effort needed.


I offer no quick fixes or magic solutions; because there aren't any,
and if there were, do you not think that boxers, wrestlers, police, military AND THE CRIMINALS THEMSELVES WOULD HAVE FIGURED THEM OUT BY NOW, WITH ALL THE FIGHTING THEY DO???!!! ;)



99% of martial arts and 'self defence' instruction is rubbish, taught by people who have no extensive background actually FIGHTING AND SURVIVING IN UNFORGIVING ENVIRONMENTS.


My 'Nouveau-Bartitsu' system is part of that 1% that can actually drastically improve a person's chances of staying safe and being best prepared for the horrors that we see daily on the TV and in the papers, but that we HOPEFULLY will never have to face, on the street or in our family home.........


https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/71/6f/48/716f48bf10a247507ba68689f1992396.jpg

http://victoriansupersleuth.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/living-london-attacked-by-two.jpg

http://www.bradfordmidlandhotel.com/wp-content/gallery/garrotting/garrotting-image-2-sm.jpg

http://victoriansupersleuth.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/living-london-sandbagging-in-the-fog.jpg

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjtonS6Pb5j9QA1Ce4ogJqq1-oGBp-PJw5OCFzEM3MLn8zqMG-Y_PA8fnKkmJ9QxI1TPhiu3zKkOItiFM0CHL9sWC8Y1-3Z12SbWsqaQmxhx9kbHjUVRwMGahiQbGrrdWInvfHVsJ5f0fA/s1600/burglar+ipn+8+29+1896.jpg

http://www.bartitsu.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ubiquitous-Thug-1.jpg

http://www.bartitsu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Bicicletta-2.jpg


FOR UPCOMING COURSES, PRIVATE CLASSES OR CONSULTANCY IN LONDON, CONTACT ME VIA FACEBOOK

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Modern-Antagonistics/1475307999457462?fref=ts

OR BY E-MAIL

modernantagonistics@yahoo.com

http://www.ukbartitsu.com/#!listed-affiliates/c1xa9
BONNAFOUS Cane


 BONNAFOUS Cane page:2


 BONNAFOUS Cane page:3

Wednesday 2 September 2015